Today I attended a webinar on peatland restoration for Natural Flood Management (NFM). 145 people attended the call, where Tim Allott from the University of Manchester presented on what restorative action could be taken to help benefit both the peatlands, and slow the flow of water and runoff, to benefit downstream flood risk. Tim started by discussing the advancement in the scientific understanding of peatland restoration, and the flood benefits downstream. |
|
Peatlands make up ~10% of UK land cover and ~60% of uplands. Few are in a natural or ‘intact’ state (~20%), as many have been degraded, managed or damaged. There is a strong history of management of peatlands including land drainage, which has led to accelerating investment in peatland restoration. For example, the Scottish Budget 2020-21 has allocated £20million for peatland restoration, for multiple benefits including biodiversity and erosion. The importance of peatlands is becoming clearer, as they are areas of carbon store and water regulation functions, raised by NFM and water quantity issues. Tim pointed out there is a gradient of confidence about the extent to which peatland restoration will help alleviate downstream flooding. In order to encourage investment in peatland restoration for NFM, the benefits need to be demonstrated. He continued by discussing the review which looked at establishing our current understanding of NFM in peatland catchments, and how restoration can benefit hydrological processes. |
|
There are different types of peatland restoration, which aim to restore ecological function of peat, reduce and delay peak flows across the wider catchment, and make a difference to downstream flood risk. The 2 main aims for peatland restoration are:
|
There are several types of peatland restoration:
|
|
Tim’s key messages were that peat restoration techniques will be site specific and scale dependent. Many catchment scale studies have looked at how the hydrograph changes in response to restoration actions. Most modelling studies are at larger scales, whilst field studies tend to be across smaller catchments. However, there remains a lack of data on many restoration types, and we need a better understanding of responses over longer time periods. Thanks to Tim for this really informative webinar. It was really interesting to see an overview of what techniques are available to reduce flows in the uplands, slow flows, and benefit habitats and flood risk. |
Add new comment